Close Menu
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
What's On

What Most Subscription Businesses Miss About Customer Churn

September 18, 2026

Larry Ellison’s about-face on an Oracle stock sale sparks chatter in Silicon Valley, Hollywood 

September 18, 2026

Why Businesses Need Ethical, Responsible AI To Thrive

September 18, 2026

Andrew Yang joins chorus of AI skeptics, says it’s time to tap brakes while sharing juicy gossip: ‘The fear is real’

September 18, 2026

Couple spends SpaceX IPO riches on $25K-a-month year of travel to French Alps, Italian Grand Prix

September 18, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Demo
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Home » Why Businesses Need Ethical, Responsible AI To Thrive

Why Businesses Need Ethical, Responsible AI To Thrive

By News RoomSeptember 18, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Reddit Email Tumblr
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Mohanty is an award-winning AI leader & entrepreneur. She is an Applied Science Manager at Amazon & Vice Chair of IEEE Women in Engineering.

With AI applications already in everything from business to science and ecology to society, businesses need to realize that it’s not about adopting AI faster than your competitors but about adopting it more wisely. Leaders need to ensure that when integrating AI, they start with ethical foundations and move forward with responsible practices, ultimately gaining trust—both internally and externally.

What Is Ethical And Responsible AI? What’s the Difference?

Although the two concepts are closely related, they aren’t identical. Ethical AI defines the moral compass an institution needs to consider before adopting AI and includes values such as dignity, fairness, human agency, inclusion, privacy and social benefit. Responsible AI, on the other hand, attempts to ensure these values make it into company operations, with practices like accountability, governance, human oversight, monitoring, risk controls, testing and transparency. Essentially, businesses need ethical AI foundations translating into responsible AI practices. The former are the guiding principles while the latter are the steering, brakes and dashboard.

These concepts seem tenuous, but a consensus has emerged about what they should mean. Let’s start with industry standards and intergovernmental agency definitions of ethical AI. For example, IEEE’s Ethically Aligned Design guidebook says AI systems should remain human-centric, serve human values and prioritize human well-being rather than just focusing on the end goal. It prescribes standards, policies, training and certification mechanisms that translate ethical AI design into responsible AI practices. Similarly, UNESCO’s “Recommendation on the Ethics of AI“ program clarifies AI governance must be grounded in accountability, dignity, fairness, human oversight, human rights, multi-stakeholder governance, non-discrimination, privacy, transparency and sustainability.

Such tenets are also echoed by major technology firms when advocating for responsible AI. For example, Microsoft’s responsible AI principles name accountability, fairness, inclusiveness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, and transparency as its core commitments for designing and releasing AI technologies. IBM emphasizes trust and transparency, including AI that augments human capability, responsible data governance, explainability, fairness, robustness and accountability through enterprise-wide governance. AWS defines responsible AI through dimensions such as fairness, explainability, privacy and security, safety, controllability, veracity and robustness, governance and transparency, while also stressing human oversight and safeguards.

Finally, looking at scientific research on these principles, we see a reinforcement in the same direction. One systematic review of responsible AI principles and practices notes that it’s emerged as a way to ensure protections without stifling innovation while minimizing risks to people, society and the environment. Other research on responsible AI also highlights ethics, explainability, privacy, security, trust and a human-centric approach as essential to trustworthy AI deployment.

What Do These Concepts Mean for Businesses?

The primary requirement for businesses is to treat ethical AI as strategy, not just a means to compliance. It can’t just be a PDF published after the product roadmap is complete. It must shape which use cases are pursued, which risks are tolerated, which datasets are used, which stakeholders are consulted and which decisions remain under human control. A company deciding whether to automate business practices must ask not only “Can AI do this?” but “Should AI do this, for whom, under what controls and with what recourse if something goes wrong?”

Businesses must ensure their AI governance is concrete, and not just symbolic. For reference, IBM’s published approach connects principles to governance structures such as an AI ethics board, policy advisory mechanisms and employee advocacy networks. Businesses can adapt this logic by creating a cross-functional AI review body, assigning clear owners for AI risk, requiring model and data documentation, auditing high-impact systems and defining escalation paths when teams encounter ethical uncertainty.

Responsible AI needs to be embedded across the AI life cycle. In the design phase, businesses should assess purpose, stakeholders, harms and necessity. During development, companies must test data quality, bias, robustness, privacy, security and explainability. While deploying, human-in-the-loop controls must be integrated where decisions affect rights, safety, employment, credit, healthcare or essential services. Finally, in operation, companies must monitor drift, failures, misuse, complaints and disparities.

It’s also vital that businesses make AI transparency a customer-facing affair, turning uncertainty into informed consent—a foundation of trust. It means telling people when they’re interacting with AI, what the system is intended to do, what its limits are, what data it uses and how humans can review or correct outcomes. With this in mind, it’s paramount that human oversight is implemented, so humans remain accountable and in control.

A Responsible Return On Investment

The incorporation of ethical AI foundations and responsible AI practices can deliver a healthy return on investment. This is because such a design and implementation reduces the likelihood of reputational harm, regulatory conflict, biased outcomes, privacy breaches and customer backlash. Businesses will find that this approach also results in value creation and accelerates the adoption of their services because people will happily use systems that they trust. Employees are more likely to integrate AI into daily workflows when they believe outputs are reliable and in line with organizational values. Customers will be more willing to accept AI-enabled products when they’re coupled with explainability, fairness, recourse and safety.

Ethical AI Design And Responsible AI Practices Build Influence

AI anxiety is swiftly rising, making ethical AI credibility a brand asset. Future market dynamics will reward firms that combine innovation with legitimacy. Businesses with responsible AI practices gain influence with regulators, partners, buyers, investors, employees and consumers. This will position them better for public-private partnerships, shaping standards and winning contracts where trustworthiness is a procurement criterion. As AI systems proliferate, weak governance could have serious consequences.

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Ipsita Mohanty
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related News

What Most Subscription Businesses Miss About Customer Churn

September 18, 2026

How To Turn AI Agents Into A Full-Scale Workforce

September 17, 2026

Quality Assurance Tips For Improving Fintech Software

September 17, 2026

Tokenization Is Transforming The Rails Beneath Financial Markets

September 17, 2026

Rethinking The Infrastructure Behind Intelligent Workspaces

September 17, 2026

Why AI’s Productivity Boost Is Still Hard To Prove

September 17, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

Larry Ellison’s about-face on an Oracle stock sale sparks chatter in Silicon Valley, Hollywood 

Business September 18, 2026

Larry Ellison’s disclosure last week that he planned to sell $7.5 billion in Oracle stock…

Why Businesses Need Ethical, Responsible AI To Thrive

September 18, 2026

Andrew Yang joins chorus of AI skeptics, says it’s time to tap brakes while sharing juicy gossip: ‘The fear is real’

September 18, 2026

Couple spends SpaceX IPO riches on $25K-a-month year of travel to French Alps, Italian Grand Prix

September 18, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks

Mortgage rates jump to nearly 7% after Fed rate hike — highest in nearly two years

September 18, 2026

Paramount is getting an assist from a key California pol as it defends its Warner merger against AG Rob Bonta

September 18, 2026

KPMG places manager on leave after Bill Ackman shared video of her calling a man a ‘Zionist pig’

September 17, 2026

Toys ‘R’ Us to open 120 stores, biggest expansion in years — thanks to adults who ‘didn’t wanna grow up’

September 17, 2026
The Financial News 247
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
© 2026 The Financial 247. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.