Close Menu
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
What's On

What Robotics Taught Me About Belonging

October 9, 2026

SpaceX takes major step toward offering cell service, putting big telecom on edge

October 9, 2026

How Network Infrastructure Became A National Security Risk

October 9, 2026

Stock bull market nears 4-year anniversary thanks to AI spending

October 9, 2026

Public Safety Works Better Together

October 9, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Demo
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Home » How Network Infrastructure Became A National Security Risk

How Network Infrastructure Became A National Security Risk

By News RoomOctober 9, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Reddit Email Tumblr
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Yuriy Bulygin is CEO and co-founder of Eclypsium.

​Adversarial actors are using our network infrastructure against us for cyber espionage operations. And we’re making it easy for them. ​

Network device exploits are growing faster than NVIDIA’s stock price. According to the 2025 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) cited by SecurityWeek, firewalls, VPNs, routers, switches and other network infrastructure devices have seen an eightfold increase in vulnerability exploitation over two years, rapidly outpacing credential abuse as an initial intrusion vector.

In a keynote address at the 2026 RSA Conference, Pat Opet, Global Chief Information Security Officer of JPMorgan Chase, said that half of the critical vulnerabilities his team addressed were in network edge devices. ​

Who is targeting these network edge devices? Often, it is allegedly state-sponsored advanced persistent threat groups that have been sanctioned for targeting American critical infrastructure. Salt Typhoon targeted telecommunications. Volt Typhoon targeted the U.S. Navy, among other targets. Pacific Rim targeted nuclear facilities, state security agencies and more.​

All of these attacks compromised network devices like firewalls and VPNs, as well as edge and backbone routers. These devices were used to execute a range of attack tactics, techniques and procedures, from initial access to lateral movement to persistence and data exfiltration. ​

These attackers are literally inside our firewalls, using our perimeter devices, installed specifically to protect us, against us.

​How did we lose our edge?

Using firewalls and VPNs is standard operating procedure for enterprises. Some, like those handling sensitive data subject to HIPAA and other regulations, are legally required to deploy firewalls. And when enterprises purchase large deployments of network infrastructure devices like firewalls and VPNs, they are forced to trust that those vendors that the devices are secure. The vendors have not earned this trust.​​

There is a small number of large, global vendors that sell network infrastructure devices to enterprises. Cisco. Palo Alto Networks. Fortinet. Arista. Juniper. F5. These vendors create both technical and contractual limitations to their customers’ abilities to examine or modify the functionality of the appliances. Buyers do not get access to the source code of their firewalls, and they cannot install monitoring agents on these devices.

When a vulnerability is disclosed, enterprises have to wait for the vendor to issue a patch. As discovery and exploitation of vulnerabilities accelerate rapidly, trusting and relying on vendors this way is becoming unsustainable.​​

Additionally, these vendors did not build all of the software that goes into their appliances. The underlying operating system used on most network devices is either Linux or FreeBSD, both of which have numerous actively exploited critical vulnerabilities.

Even vendor-customized versions of these underlying systems are regularly discovered to have actively exploited vulnerabilities, memory-unsafe code and open-source package dependencies. ​​

All of these conditions lead to a situation in which American enterprises are essentially required to purchase network technologies that make it easier, not harder, for foreign threats to break in and sabotage both enterprise interests and our nation’s security. ​

How can we protect our infrastructure?​

Abuse of vulnerable network infrastructure is at least as much of a risk to U.S. interests as abuse of advanced AI models could be. Recognizing the AI risk, the U.S. took decisive action with recent export controls applied to AI models like Mythos.

If the government will step in to restrict the distribution of these models to mitigate cyber risk, then something needs to be done about the massive attack surface that we continue to build in our network infrastructure.​

There is no instant fix for this, but “do nothing” is not an option. Vendors have not proven they will proactively deliver truly secure, hardened network infrastructure. So enterprises should take their security and trust into their own hands.

This is what the majority of my conversations are focused on at Eclypsium: securing infrastructure at the edge of AI. While my company works in this space, the specific solution used by security teams is less important than the strategies.

First, enterprises should demand visibility into the network infrastructure devices they purchase. If an organization cannot independently verify what software and firmware is running on a firewall, router or VPN appliance, it is operating on blind trust alone. Security teams need the ability to inventory components, validate firmware integrity, identify vulnerable software, detect unauthorized modifications and continuously monitor these devices throughout their operational lifecycle.​

These devices deserve the same continuous monitoring, security validation and operational scrutiny that enterprises already apply to servers and endpoints.

Second, organizations should stop accepting network infrastructure that is a black box that only the vendor can inspect. Network devices are now one of the most common entry points used by nation-state attackers. Defaulting to opacity is unacceptable. In the same presentation we referenced earlier, JPMC’s Pat Opet said his team contacts network vendors twice a day about vulnerabilities in their products. Buyers must insist that their vendors deliver secure products.

Finally, policymakers and critical infrastructure operators need to recognize that this is bigger than the enterprise. Network edge assurance is a national security issue. The U.S. has spent years responding to one campaign after another that exploited the same class of network infrastructure weaknesses. As long as these devices remain opaque and difficult for customers to verify, attackers will continue to find opportunities that defenders cannot easily see. ​

Attackers have already shown us how they intend to fight. They target the infrastructure we trust the most because it gives them persistence, privileged access and a path around traditional security controls.

Until enterprises and government agencies can independently verify the integrity of the network infrastructure they depend on, we will continue leaving valuable footholds inside our critical systems.​

Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Yuriy Bulygin
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related News

What Robotics Taught Me About Belonging

October 9, 2026

Public Safety Works Better Together

October 9, 2026

​In The AI Era, Execution Is The New Moat

October 9, 2026

It’s Time For Employee Comms And Leaders To Measure What Moves People

October 9, 2026

Where To Draw The Line With AI

October 9, 2026

Why Isn’t AI Helping B2B Technology Companies Close Faster?

October 8, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss

SpaceX takes major step toward offering cell service, putting big telecom on edge

Business October 9, 2026

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is moving to get into the cell phone business — scooping up…

How Network Infrastructure Became A National Security Risk

October 9, 2026

Stock bull market nears 4-year anniversary thanks to AI spending

October 9, 2026

Public Safety Works Better Together

October 9, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks

Trump establishes committee to investigate Fed Governor Lisa Cook’s mortgage fraud statements

October 9, 2026

​In The AI Era, Execution Is The New Moat

October 9, 2026

It’s Time For Employee Comms And Leaders To Measure What Moves People

October 9, 2026

Where To Draw The Line With AI

October 9, 2026
The Financial News 247
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
© 2026 The Financial 247. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.