Vincent Ledoux-Pedailles, champions biographite—a disruptive tech catalysing a paradigm shift in battery supply chains. CCO of CarbonScape.
The intensifying race for critical minerals like lithium, cobalt and graphite—essential for powering electric vehicles (EVs) and other clean-energy technologies—has put global supply chains under unprecedented strain. Among these, battery-grade graphite stands out as a crucial yet often overlooked component.
Currently, China refines a large portion of the world’s graphite, and in 2023, the country introduced tighter export controls on certain graphite products. To address this, governments worldwide have been enacting policies to secure critical minerals and reduce reliance on foreign sources. The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), U.S. measures like the Inflation Reduction Act, Defense Production Act and recent tariffs, Canada’s Critical Minerals Strategy and Australia’s Critical Minerals Facilitation Office all seek to level the paying field. While such measures can shift trade flows in the short term, they fail to tackle the deeper need for domestic manufacturing infrastructure and more sustainable production methods.
Having negotiated major offtake agreements, secured significant equity funding and served as a critical raw materials expert for the European Commission, I’ve witnessed the battery industry’s rapid evolution up close. I understand the complexities of supply chains, environmental imperatives and the breakthroughs shaping this market. In my view, an innovation-first strategy—one that combines technological breakthroughs with greener supply chains—offers the most effective path to ensuring long-term security.
Why Graphite Matters
Graphite is at the heart of lithium-ion batteries, often comprising up to one-third of an EV battery cell. The International Energy Agency forecasts accelerating EV uptake globally, with much higher demand for key battery materials as a result. Any setback in graphite availability could ripple through the entire EV ecosystem, stalling production and raising costs.
The Innovation Imperative
Traditional graphite production methods have changed little over the years. High temperatures and multi-week processes make these methods profitable primarily in countries with affordable energy and well-honed supply chains, benefiting China in particular.
However, emerging innovators are experimenting with alternative feedstocks, lower process temperatures and quicker production cycles. These advances could reshape the entire cost structure and environmental footprint of battery graphite. Rather than relying on trade restrictions, we can invest in techniques that position local producers as competitive on their own merits.
Localizing Production: Benefits And Considerations
There are a few key things to consider here:
1. Supply Security: Building strategically located facilities helps diversify the global supply of graphite anode materials. A distributed network of smaller, modern facilities reduces exposure to geopolitical risks and export controls.
2. Cost Control: Proximity to sustainable feedstocks and final assembly lines can cut freight costs and minimize duties. If the process itself is made more efficient, local operations might match or outpace established monopoly players on price.
3. Reduced Carbon Footprint: From what I’ve seen, advanced graphite processes that harness renewable sequestered carbon sources can significantly shrink embedded emissions. That dual benefit can be a powerful draw for environmentally conscious manufacturers.
4. Infrastructure And Collaboration: Bringing new graphite capacity online involves an ecosystem of raw-material suppliers, technology providers and end users. Early partnerships can drive standardization and market adoption.
While these benefits are clear, localizing production also comes with a need for thorough permitting, funding and workforce development. Securing the right balance between investment incentives and environmental safeguards is critical to sustained success.
Strategies For Successful Scale-Up
To see the actualization of this future, we must look at the following:
1. Develop Pilots And Demonstrations: Translating a lab concept into full-scale production is rarely a one-step process. It often begins with pilot plants producing limited volumes—enough to validate technical parameters and market demand. Once data is verified, a demonstration facility can follow, bridging the gap between theoretical scale and commercial reality. This incremental approach helps minimize financial risk and ensures the process can be replicated at industrial volumes.
2. Leverage Alternative Feedstocks: Some next-generation producers rely on agricultural or forestry side streams products—an approach sometimes referred to as “biographite.” By using abundant, renewable carbon sequestered streams, these technologies can reduce dependence on fossil-based precursors or distant mining operations. If done according to properly defined parameters—such as verified biomass sourcing and moderate temperature requirements—this model can drastically lower both costs and carbon output.
3. Collaborate Across The Supply Chain: Battery makers, automotive OEMs and advanced material startups must work together from the outset. Joint specification trials, cost-sharing initiatives and early feedback loops help align a novel process with real-world manufacturing constraints. This ensures that by the time a technology is scaled, it already meets industry standards for purity, performance and logistics.
4. Incentivize Domestic Infrastructure: Beyond tariffs, targeted subsidies or grants can accelerate localized pilot and demonstration facilities. Policymakers could, for example, offer tax benefits for investment in low-emission feedstocks or cap-ex assistance for modern equipment. Such incentives often catalyze a competitive ecosystem while reducing reliance on a single external source. Moreover, establishing domestic graphite production can yield significant economic benefits for local communities, creating jobs and stimulating growth in adjacent sectors.
5. Balance Environmental And Economic Goals: Sustainable production is no longer a secondary concern—it is rapidly becoming a primary market differentiator. Scaling up an innovative process should not only make financial sense but also stand up to stricter environmental standards. This includes stable sourcing of raw materials, efficient water usage and transparent life cycle assessments. Achieving both cost competitiveness and green credentials can transform a technology from a niche option into an industry standard.
Looking Ahead
Ultimately, the West’s reliance on a single major source of graphite is not an overnight problem, and tariffs alone are insufficient for tackling the underlying challenges of domestic capacity. Innovation can provide the cost, quality and sustainability edges needed to break free from the status quo.
With consumer demand for electric vehicles projected to keep climbing, now is the time for manufacturers, governments and startups to work together on scaling up novel graphite production methods. If successful, the payoff could be plentiful. In my view, that is where the real future lies—driven not by endless trade barriers, but by the technological breakthroughs that position local suppliers to compete on a truly global stage.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
