Close Menu
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
What's On
How AI-pricing could harm retailers

How AI-pricing could harm retailers

February 13, 2026
Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after B overhaul

Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after $2B overhaul

February 13, 2026
Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

February 13, 2026
McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

February 13, 2026
Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

February 12, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Demo
  • Home
  • News
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Companies
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Lifestyle
  • Tech
  • More
    • Opinion
    • Climate
    • Web Stories
    • Spotlight
    • Press Release
The Financial News 247The Financial News 247
Home » How AI-pricing could harm retailers

How AI-pricing could harm retailers

By News RoomFebruary 13, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Telegram Reddit Email Tumblr
How AI-pricing could harm retailers
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

Is the age of “surveillance pricing” upon us?

Most Americans hope not, according to new research.

The concept of retailers potentially using AI to set individual pricing for products based on a user’s data or purchasing history has naturally prompted concerns over privacy and fairness.

Six in 10 (62%) Americans polled by Talker Research said they are either somewhat (33%) or very concerned (29%) about the prospect of having personalized pricing based on factors like their browsing habits, location or other data points.

62% of Americans polled said they are either somewhat (33%) or very concerned (29%) about “personalized pricing” based on their browsing habits, location or other data points.

Just 10% of the 2,000 people studied said they were unconcerned about the prospect that this may one day come into practice.

California’s attorney general is currently examining how businesses use data to individualize prices, while New York officials enacted a law last year requiring retailers to have a clear disclaimer if setting prices based on personal data, Forbes reports.

The implications of introducing pricing models in this way may have very real implications.

Two-thirds said they would stop shopping at a particular retailer using the model.

If they discovered they were charged more for a product or service than someone else as a result of their personal data or purchase history being considered, two-thirds (66%) of Americans would stop shopping at that particular retailer, according to results.

One in six (17%) said they would continue to shop regardless and the same number (17%) were unsure as to how they’d react should they be charged more for something based on their personal information.

Is there an argument that such models could actually be more fair for consumers?

Overall, respondents were more inclined to suggest personalized pricing (or algorithmic pricing) as less fair (37%) overall than fixed pricing.

However, results were not unanimous, with 30% feeling it could actually be more fair and 33% feeling it’s about the same fairness either way.

Perhaps tellingly, it seems choice is key to Americans in the matter of personalized pricing.

Close to half (48%) said they’d be more likely to shop at a retailer that allowed them to opt out of data-based pricing, even if it meant missing out on personalized discounts and deals.

According to Forbes, New York officials enacted a law last year requiring retailers to make a clear disclaimer if prices come from personal data.

Many are not interested either way, with 42% saying the ability to opt out makes no difference, while just 10 percent say the ability to opt out of personal pricing would make them less likely to buy from the retailer.

How concerned or unconcerned are you about online retailers using your personal data (purchase history, browsing, location, etc.) to set different prices for different shoppers?

Very concerned – 29%

Somewhat concerned – 33%

Neither concerned or unconcerned – 28%

Somewhat unconcerned – 6%

Very uncensored – 4%

Research methodology:

Talker Research surveyed 2,000 Americans. The survey was administered and conducted online by Talker Research between December 5th and December 10th, 2025. A link to the questionnaire can be found here.

artificial intelligence Business customer retail retailers Tech
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related News

Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after B overhaul

Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after $2B overhaul

February 13, 2026
Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

February 13, 2026
McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

February 13, 2026
Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

February 12, 2026
Top Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after ‘xoxo’ emails with Epstein surface

Top Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after ‘xoxo’ emails with Epstein surface

February 12, 2026
Here’s the real reason Goldman CEO David Solomon is sticking by his top lawyer in Jeffrey Epstein mess

Here’s the real reason Goldman CEO David Solomon is sticking by his top lawyer in Jeffrey Epstein mess

February 12, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after B overhaul

Waldorf Astoria’s Chinese owners put iconic NYC hotel up for sale after $2B overhaul

Business February 13, 2026

The Waldorf Astoria is headed for the auction block. Dajia Insurance Group, the Chinese state-backed…

Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

Hermès CEO says he rejected ‘financial predator’ Jeffrey Epstein’s outreach

February 13, 2026
McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

McDonald’s sees sales soar as cash-strapped customers look for value meals

February 13, 2026
Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

Tech insiders says recent AI advancements change everything

February 12, 2026
Stay In Touch
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Instagram
  • YouTube
  • Vimeo
Our Picks
Top Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after ‘xoxo’ emails with Epstein surface

Top Goldman Sachs lawyer Kathy Ruemmler to resign after ‘xoxo’ emails with Epstein surface

February 12, 2026
Here’s the real reason Goldman CEO David Solomon is sticking by his top lawyer in Jeffrey Epstein mess

Here’s the real reason Goldman CEO David Solomon is sticking by his top lawyer in Jeffrey Epstein mess

February 12, 2026
Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser’s pay jumps 22% to M following years of job cuts

Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser’s pay jumps 22% to $42M following years of job cuts

February 12, 2026
Why the shakeup at the DOJ’s antitrust division is a victory for free-market Republicans

Why the shakeup at the DOJ’s antitrust division is a victory for free-market Republicans

February 12, 2026
The Financial News 247
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
© 2026 The Financial 247. All Rights Reserved.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.