Dr. Najwa Aaraj, Chief Executive Officer, Technology Innovation Institute (TII) and QuantumGate.
“Space: the final frontier.” While questions around AI sovereignty are top-of-mind today for C-suites in organizations worldwide, a new conversation demands that tech leaders look not just outward at their closest competitors, but also upward—specifically, toward the stars. Space sovereignty is the new must-have capability, the mission-critical form of technical autonomy that (in the words of a certain immortal TV show) will ultimately allow enterprises and countries to “explore new worlds, and go where no man has gone before.”
It’s important to clarify, first and foremost, what space sovereignty, or space sovereign capability, actually means. In this case, it refers to having the people, tech and institutional knowledge to be able to make critical decisions about missions. This could mean, say, owning a satellite—but that would only be one aspect of it. As deeper capabilities are developed, such as being able to design and test new systems, space sovereignty means understanding how the data is created and processed and being able to adapt technology when a mission faces a new challenge.
Having space sovereignty doesn’t necessitate working alone. Far from it: Space exploration requires a lot of international partnerships. However, a country undeniably contributes far more to those partnerships when it has its own kind of expertise and tech than when it is wholly reliant on other countries’. And of course, in an era where data and technology sovereignty are both increasingly important, developing space sovereign capability is a prudent hedge against over-reliance on partners whose strategic visions may not always align with one’s own.
The New Strategic Value Of Space
Bluntly, there’s a lot going on in space and space exploration that was not happening as quickly two, five or 10 years ago. Space is becoming more and more closely connected to decisions made here on Earth, from both a communications and environmental perspective. At the same time, missions are becoming more complex and more dependent on software and data processing than before.
If those capabilities are developed internally, a country can use that system without having limitations on the freedom to shape what it does next. They can set up their research priorities or target other goals—for instance, there is talk of storing AI data in space right now. Fundamentally, the imperative has moved beyond access to space alone; now, it’s about who can develop the actual raw tech, who will interpret those results from the data and, crucially, who will define the mission going forward.
The advancement of AI has, of course, both raised the potential and exacerbated the urgency of attaining space sovereignty—but so has the increasing complexity of missions, which increasingly require more autonomous spacecraft. The farther spacecraft travel, the less useful it is to assume that any human being or team on Earth can and should direct any action: Signals take a long time to travel, so deep space comms cannot be fully reliant on an immediate human response. There may be time-sensitive observations or decisions that need to be made before any instruction could arrive.
Autonomy allows a spacecraft greater latitude not only to carry out the defined tasks, but to assess unplanned situations and determine what is needed or possible. It makes a mission more responsive, more scientifically productive and maintains a high level of reliability. With the help of AI, we see that scientific processes are being both improved and expedited, and projects are being unveiled that are stunning in their ambition, such as the UAE’s planned 2028 probe launch to the asteroid belt. We are at the point where missions that were—until now—merely the stuff of science fiction are now becoming possible in the next few years.
Building The Capabilities To Go Farther
The question, then, is what countries—and the companies and research institutions within them—need to do to build space sovereign capability. The answer starts with developing expertise across the full chain of a space mission: mission design, hardware, software, data processing, AI and autonomous systems. It means investing not just in individual technologies but also in the institutional knowledge required to design, test and adapt those technologies as missions evolve. It also means investing in people, creating opportunities for them to gain the necessary skills, understanding and capabilities to work effectively with these constantly evolving systems and adapt as the technology and mission requirements change.
Technological capabilities cannot exist entirely in silos. Complex missions require expertise in everything from AI and autonomy to advanced materials and thermal design to work together. Building an ecosystem in which those disciplines can collaborate is itself a form of space capability, and one that becomes increasingly important as missions grow more complex and extend farther from Earth. International partnerships will remain essential; the strongest participants in any partnership will be the countries or companies that bring their own talent and technology to the table.
The next phase of the space race will not be won simply by reaching ever farther into space. It will be won by developing both the expertise to decide what to do once we get there and the technology to act on those decisions. Space sovereignty isn’t simply the ability to reach orbit. It is the ability to define the mission, develop the underlying technology, interpret the data and results and, increasingly, empower spacecraft to make the right decisions on their own.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?